Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.
Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Thoracic Surgery ClinicsAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68: 394-424
- Global trends in esophageal cancer.J Surg Oncol. 2017; 115: 564-579
- Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.JNCCN. 2019; 17: 883-885
- Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery.N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 2128-2137
- Benchmarking Complications Associated with Esophagectomy.Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 291-298
- Prevention of delayed gastric emptying after esophagectomy: a single center's experience with botulinum toxin.Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 87 ([discussion: 13-4]): 1708-1713
- Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, PA2017
- Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2012; 379: 1887-1892
- Immunological changes after minimally invasive or conventional esophageal resection for cancer: a randomized trial.World J Surg. 2014; 38: 131-137
- Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-year Follow-up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: the TIME Trial.Ann Surg. 2017; 266: 232-236
- Prehabilitation for esophagectomy.J Thorac Dis. 2019; 11: S632-S638
- Effect of a multimodal prehabilitation program on postoperative recovery and morbidity in patients undergoing a totally minimally invasive esophagectomy.Dis Esophagus. 2022; 35: 1-8
- Ivor Lewis approach is superior to transhiatal approach in retrieval of lymph nodes at esophagectomy.Dis Esophagus. 2008; 21: 328-333
- Transhiatal vs. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A NSQIP Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes and Risk Factors for Morbidity.J Gastrointest Surg. 2017; 21: 1757-1763
- Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Surg. 2021; 156: 601-610
- Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Surgery. 2022; 172: 575-583
- Transhiatal Esophagectomy: How I Teach It.Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102: 1432-1437
- First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.Surg Endosc. 2006; 20: 1435-1439
- Early Quality of Life Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy.Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 108: 920-928
- Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial).Trials. 2012; 13: 230
- Outcomes of 350 Robotic-assisted Esophagectomies at a High-volume Cancer Center: A Contemporary Propensity-score Matched Analysis.Ann Surg. 2022; 276: 111-118
- Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center initial experience.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 6: 179-185
- Robotic gastrectomy and esophagogastrectomy: A single center experience of 105 cases.J Surg Oncol. 2015; 112: 888-893
- Robotic Esophagectomy for Cancer: Early Results and Lessons Learned.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 28: 160-169
- Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial.Ann Surg. 2022; 275: 646-653
- Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer.Dis Esophagus. 2018; 31
- Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy.Surg Endosc. 2020; 34: 814-820
- Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.Int J Med Robot. 2019; 15: e1988
- Robot-assisted mediastinoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: the first clinical series.Esophagus. 2019; 16: 85-92
- Learning Curve and Associated Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 88-94
- Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: description of a learning curve.J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218: 1130-1140
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
