Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 33, ISSUE 1, P11-17, February 2023

Starting and Developing a Robotic Thoracic Surgery Program

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Thoracic Surgery Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Abbas A.E.
        Surgical management of lung cancer: history, evolution, and modern advances.
        Curr Oncol Rep. 2018; 20: 98
        • Farivar A.S.
        • Cerfolio R.J.
        • Vallières E.
        • et al.
        Comparing robotic lung resection with thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases entered into the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.
        Innovations (Phila). 2014; 9: 10-15
        • Louie B.E.
        • Farivar A.S.
        • Aye R.W.
        • et al.
        Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 93 ([discussion: 1604–5]): 1598-1604
        • Wei B.
        • Eldaif S.M.
        • Cerfolio R.J.
        Robotic lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer.
        Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2016; 25: 515-531
        • Yang Y.
        • Li B.
        • Yi J.
        • et al.
        Robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: early results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial: the RAMIE Trial.
        Ann Surg. 2022; 275: 646-653
        • van der Sluis P.C.
        • van der Horst S.
        • May A.M.
        • et al.
        Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
        Ann Surg. 2019; 269: 621-630
        • Barbash G.I.
        New technology and health care costs: the case of robot-assisted surgery.
        N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 701
        • Resnick A.S.
        • Corrigan D.
        • Mullen J.L.
        • et al.
        Surgeon contribution to hospital bottom line: not all are created equal.
        Ann Surg. 2005; 242 ([discussion: 537–9]): 530-537
        • Wagner O.J.
        • Louie B.E.
        • Vallières E.
        • et al.
        Near-infrared fluorescence imaging can help identify the contralateral phrenic nerve during robotic thymectomy.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 94: 622-625
        • Sarkaria I.S.
        • Bains M.S.
        • Finley D.J.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging as an adjunct to robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.
        Innovations. 2014; 9: 391-393
        • Galetta D.
        • Casiraghi M.
        • Pardolesi A.
        • et al.
        New stapling devices in robotic surgery.
        J Vis Surg. 2017; 3: 45
        • Onwugbufor M.T.
        • Predina J.D.
        • Osho A.A.
        • et al.
        10 commandments of robotic lobectomy.
        Innovations (Phila). 2021; 16: 123-126
        • Estes S.J.
        • Goldenberg D.
        • Winder J.S.
        • et al.
        Best practices for robotic surgery programs.
        Jsls. 2017; 21
        • Cerfolio R.J.
        • Bryant A.S.
        • Minnich D.J.
        Starting a robotic program in general thoracic surgery: why, how, and lessons learned.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 91: 1729-1737
        • Linsky P.L.
        • Wei B.
        Training in robotic thoracic surgery.
        J Vis Surg. 2018; 4: 1
        • Lee B.E.
        • Korst R.J.
        • Kletsman E.
        • et al.
        Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: are there outcomes advantages?.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 147: 724-729
        • Thornblade L.W.
        • Fong Y.
        Simulation-based training in robotic surgery: contemporary and future methods.
        J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021; 31: 556-560
        • Finnegan K.T.
        • Meraney A.M.
        • Staff I.
        • et al.
        da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance.
        Urology. 2012; 80: 330-335
        • Artsen A.M.
        • L SB
        • Duvvuri U.
        • et al.
        Surgeon satisfaction and outcomes of tele-proctoring for robotic gynecologic surgery.
        J Robot Surg. 2022; 16: 563-568
        • Bhora F.Y.
        • Al-Ayoubi A.M.
        • Rehmani S.S.
        • et al.
        Robotically assisted thoracic surgery: proposed guidelines for privileging and credentialing.
        Innovations (Phila). 2016; 11: 386-389
        • Alicuben E.T.
        • Wightman S.C.
        • Shemanski K.A.
        • et al.
        Training residents in robotic thoracic surgery.
        J Thorac Dis. 2021; 13: 6169-6178
        • Herron D.M.
        • Marohn M.
        A consensus document on robotic surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2008; 22 ([discussion: 311–2]): 313-325
        • Cerfolio R.J.
        • Cichos K.H.
        • Wei B.
        • et al.
        Robotic lobectomy can be taught while maintaining quality patient outcomes.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 152: 991-997
        • Raza S.J.
        • Froghi S.
        • Chowriappa A.
        • et al.
        Construct validation of the key components of Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery (FSRS) curriculum: a multi-institution prospective study.
        J Surg Educ. 2014; 71: 316-324
        • Kent M.S.
        • Hartwig M.G.
        • Vallières E.
        • et al.
        Pulmonary Open, Robotic and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy (PORTaL) Study: an analysis of 5,721 cases.
        Ann Surg. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005115
        • Kaur M.N.
        • Xie F.
        • Shiwcharan A.
        • et al.
        Robotic versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection during early program development.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 105: 1050-1057
        • Worrell S.G.
        • Dedhia P.
        • Gilbert C.
        • et al.
        The cost and quality of life outcomes in developing a robotic lobectomy program.
        J Robot Surg. 2019; 13: 239-243
        • Singer E.
        • Kneuertz P.J.
        • D'Souza D.M.
        • et al.
        Understanding the financial cost of robotic lobectomy: calculating the value of innovation?.
        Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 8: 194-201
        • Nasir B.S.
        • Bryant A.S.
        • Minnich D.J.
        • et al.
        Performing robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy: cost, profitability, and outcomes.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 98 ([discussion: 208–9]): 203-208
        • Nawalaniec J.T.
        • Elson M.
        • Reznik S.I.
        • et al.
        Training cardiothoracic residents in robotic lobectomy is cost-effective with no change in clinical outcomes.
        Innovations (Phila). 2022; 17: 127-135