| | Preoperative Patient Education in Thoracic SurgeryThis article describes the role of preoperative teaching in thoracic surgery. Preoperative patient teaching may take many forms and is offered to patients across many venues and formats. The goal of patient teaching is to improve patients' understanding of their disease process and the operation that they are about to experience with the goal of enlisting their active participation in the healing process. The additional goal of obtaining informed consent is not only codified in law, but also has become an ingrained component to the current physician-patient relationship. The preoperative teaching process is best approached as a team effort, and multiple modalities often must be used so that the patient becomes a knowledgeable and willing member of the team. Optimal outcome after thoracic surgery, as with any type of surgery, involves the coordinated activity of many individuals, including the patient, surgeon, anesthesiologist, nurses, resident physicians, respiratory therapists, and a host of other participants. The phrase coordinated activity implies that each participant has knowledge of his or her role and expectations. For the patient, who is generally uneducated in the course of the surgical process, this learning process involves the preoperative and postoperative period. Through the process of preoperative teaching, the patient understands his or her role in the overall process and how he (or she) can facilitate or delay recovery. This article describes the role of preoperative teaching in thoracic surgery. The focus is not on the surgeon's role, but rather the role of the greater surgical team, which frequently involves nurses, medical assistants, resident physicians, nurse practitioners, and anesthesiologists. Because most patients are new to the thoracic surgical process, the amount of information may be overwhelming—particularly when patients are confronted with a new diagnosis of malignancy or when they have no advance knowledge of the magnitude or risks of the planned surgery. As such, important concepts often are presented more than once or in more than one way. Material that the surgeon covers in the initial consultation often needs to be reinforced at a subsequent preoperative visit or even again on the day of surgery. In the authors' practice, a recommendation for surgery often is given at the time of the initial consultation. Sufficient time is allocated for the surgeon to describe the operation and its risks, benefits, and alternatives. Questions are encouraged, but often the patient cannot assimilate all of the information and formulate appropriate questions. Questions often arise in the following days, as the patient has had time to digest the information, process it, and assimilate it on intellectual and emotional levels. If a recommendation for surgery is offered at the initial consultation, the clinical nurse specialist spends additional time with the patient interpreting and reinforcing what the surgeon said, answering questions, and providing a contact telephone number for subsequent questions. Patients often have a separate visit a few days before surgery. At that time, the planned operation is reviewed again with the patient, and additional questions are answered. Patients also are seen in a preoperative anesthesia clinic by a physician or an anesthetic nurse practitioner. In this setting, information flows two ways: The anesthesia service performs a preoperative anesthesia assessment, and the patient has an opportunity to learn more about the planned anesthesia and postoperative pain issues. The final opportunity for preoperative teaching is by the perioperative nurses who, in doing their own preoperative patient assessment, answer any remaining questions and deal with remaining concerns. Content of preoperative teaching  The content of preoperative teaching should include all significant issues related to a particular patient's operation. For the purposes of discussion, the content can be separated into two groups: issues related to surgery (or thoracic surgery) in general and issues related to a specific operation. General preoperative education At the initial consultation, the surgeon usually provides an explanation of the proposed procedure. Retention of this information is highly variable and depends on the rapport between the surgeon and patient; the surgeon's willingness to provide information; and the patient's curiosity, emotional state of mind, intelligence, and knowledge base. An intellectually sophisticated patient with a background in the medical sciences who presents to the office with an Internet printout of all the latest lung cancer clinical trials is likely to be handled differently than a poorly educated patient who has done no background investigations. Similarly the emotional state of the patient must be taken into account because it is likely that an emotionally upset patient hearing the diagnosis of “cancer” for the first time may have less retention than someone who is being provided a second opinion or someone who is seeing the surgeon after a course of preoperative chemotherapy. At the conclusion of the preoperative process, all patients need to have some retained understanding of the planned procedure, why it is being recommended, what its risks are, whether there are alternatives, and how their active participation in the surgical process can make a difference in recovery. Although this information is generally covered, at some level, by the surgeon, the surgical nurse often has to review it with the patient and focus on areas where retention was inadequate. Respiratory hygiene Many of the common complications after thoracic surgery—atelectasis, pneumonia, and pulmonary embolism—are pulmonary in nature. Although pulmonary embolism cannot be prevented through improvement in pulmonary hygiene, atelectasis and pneumonia can be prevented through active patient involvement. Coughing, deep breathing, using an incentive spirometer, walking, sitting to eat, and performing other seemingly minor activities all can contribute to improved pulmonary hygiene and a decreased incidence of postoperative pneumonia. Although coughing per se is painful and controversial in terms of its ability to prevent pneumonia, avoidance of sputum retention is desired. Patients can be taught to splint the operative side to minimize pain with coughing. Deep breathing can open collapsed alveoli and prevent overt atelectasis. Walking and use of an incentive spirometer aim for the same goals—improved aeration of the lungs and avoidance of alveolar and segmental collapse. Eating in bed should be avoided because the often semirecumbent posture predisposes to aspiration and regurgitation. Although all of these respiratory hygiene measures can be addressed in the postoperative period, it is best to address these concepts initially in the preoperative period. Setting expectations is important, and in the postoperative period, when the patient's sensorium may be clouded by pain and narcotics, learning is suboptimal. Teaching proper use of an incentive spirometer is far more effective preoperatively than postoperatively when inhalation is compromised by pain. When patients are taught how to use this device preoperatively, they have a relevant basis from which to compare their postoperative inspiratory effort and function. Convincing patients that they can do much better is difficult if they have never seen the device until the evening after surgery. Pain One of the most frightening things for patients facing surgery is the expectation of pain. Other frightening concepts include loss of personal control and death. Because death is usually unlikely, and loss of control is unavoidable, the expectation of pain often becomes a major source of anxiety. In the preoperative period, the anxiety surrounding pain, rather than the pain itself, is the problem. Effective preoperative teaching can allay these fears, reduce the anxiety, and provide a framework for realistic expectations regarding postoperative pain [1], [2]. A discussion of narcotic analgesics, patient-controlled analgesia, nonsteroidal analgesics, and epidural anesthesia (continuous, intermittent, and patient controlled) is appropriate. Side effects, including nausea, gastrointestinal dysfunction, and the potential for a lack of efficacy, should be discussed. The goal of postoperative analgesia also should be discussed. Patients should not expect to be oblivious to the fact that they just had surgery, but the goal of postoperative analgesia should be pain control that provides patients with an ability to function and interact with their environment effectively. Family members should be cautioned that patient-controlled analgesia is for patients, not family members, to control. Family members also should be cautioned that narcotics may have undesirable side effects, such as somnolence, respiratory depression, dysphoria, disorientation, and even delirium. Family members should be advised that these side effects generally resolve quickly after discontinuation of narcotics, and that the physicians and nurses need to be made aware if these side effects occur. Patients should be advised that postoperative early ambulation is desirable. The upright posture has many advantages in terms of pulmonary function, although multiple attachments such as chest tubes, urinary catheters, epidural catheters, and infusion pumps often make ambulation difficult. Effective preoperative counseling sets the expectations, which can be reinforced in the postoperative period. Smoking cessation In thoracic surgical practice, many of the relevant diseases, particularly lung cancer and emphysema, are smoking related. Although many patients have quit smoking by the time they come to the thoracic surgeon, others continue to smoke because the addictive qualities of nicotine outweigh the intellectual knowledge that smoking is harmful. Faced with an upcoming operation, the patient may use smoking as a method of coping with anxiety and fear. Patients should be counseled vigorously, however, to stop smoking in preparation for surgery. Cigarette smoking impairs the mucociliary clearance mechanisms of the tracheobronchial tree and may predispose to postoperative pulmonary complications. The optimal time for smoking cessation is unclear, and one article even suggested an increase in perioperative pulmonary complications when smoking cessation occurred immediately before surgery [3], [4]. Most surgeons encourage patients to stop smoking in preparation for thoracic surgery. Whether surgery should be denied to patients who continue to smoke is controversial. Every effort should be made preoperatively to persuade the patient to stop smoking. Diet and nutrition Preoperative patient education should cover nutritional issues routinely but is particularly important in two classes of patients: (1) patients who have recently experienced a significant weight loss and (2) patients who are to undergo preoperative chemotherapy or radiation therapy. The first group includes many patients with esophageal cancer in whom dysphagia or odynophagia have limited their oral intake and resulted in a long-standing caloric deficiency. Although significant weight loss is common in patients with metastatic disease, such patients frequently are identified through preoperative staging tests and often do not come to the attention of the surgeon. The second group involves patients who ideally should be seen by the surgeon before the neoadjuvant therapy is started. In these patients, nutritional deficiencies can be expected and consequently preempted. Patient questions regarding nutritional supplementation (including herbal or other nontraditional forms of treatment) often arise at this time and can be dealt with appropriately. Wound care and drains Although most thoracic surgery patients require little or no postdischarge wound care, the preoperative visit is a reasonable time to raise this issue. Patients often have negative expectations about wound care and often are pleasantly surprised to learn that care is usually minimal. Occasionally, patients are discharged home with tubes or drains still in place. Because percutaneous tubes and drains are an integral part of modern surgical care and their use has become ubiquitous, health care providers may become numb to their invasiveness and the patient's sense of a loss of personal image. Patients should be taught about the uses and benefits of percutaneous tubes and drains as early as possible. In years past, patients routinely were kept in the hospital until all drains and tubes were out: mastectomy patients stayed in the hospital, on intravenous antibiotics, until the Jackson-Pratt drains were removed. Now, as a result of “best practice” analysis, evidence-based medicine, and changes in reimbursement policies, practices have changed, and patients are taught that it is acceptable to go home with a small drain. Postdischarge social issues Although it may seem premature to enter into a discussion of postdischarge psychosocial issues in the preoperative phase, such a discussion is not inappropriate. Postdischarge issues, such as family involvement in postoperative convalescence, job-related concerns, and expectations regarding physical limitations, including appetite, sleep irregularity, and sexual function, can be broached in the preoperative period and brought up again in more detail later. Issues that potentially may delay discharge from the hospital may become apparent in these discussions (which are frequently left to the nursing staff), and it is helpful to address these issues early so that they do not become problems later. In dealing with the patient and family, cultural sensitivity and family dynamics may play crucial roles in effecting a smooth postoperative recovery. Contact numbers Part of the preoperative teaching process is to effect seamless communication between the patient and the surgeon. Because many surgeons delegate much of the preoperative teaching to resident physicians, nurses, and other nonphysician staff, it is crucial to provide patients with a reliable method of contacting the surgeon or his or her designee. Patient satisfaction has an increasing role in determining where patients go for their care, and one of the simplest methods for improving patient satisfaction is providing them with a reliable conduit to the surgeon and his or her staff. Procedure-specific teaching In addition to the more general areas discussed earlier, each patient needs teaching directed toward the specific operation he or she is to undergo. Information that needs to be covered at this stage includes the size and location of the incision, the general outline of the operation, the expected postoperative physiologic state or deterioration from baseline, and a general overview of the risks of complications or death. Several common examples are detailed next. Pulmonary resection (lobectomy/pneumonectomy) In addition to providing information regarding incision length and position, morbidity, mortality, and other issues described previously, patients undergoing thoracotomy for pulmonary resection should receive counseling on postthoracotomy pain and the potential for decreases in pulmonary reserve. Thoracotomy incisions are notoriously painful, and although early postoperative pain can be managed effectively by modern analgesic techniques, the late issues of ongoing narcotic use and the incumbent gastrointestinal side effects should be discussed proactively. From the standpoint of loss of pulmonary reserve, patients with marginal preoperative lung function should be advised that they are likely to have less exercise capacity and that nasal oxygen therapy may be necessary on a short-term basis. In the authors' practice, patients who would be expected to require supplemental oxygen on a long-term basis rarely are offered surgery. Patients undergoing pneumonectomy are at particular risk for symptomatic decreases in exercise capacity and should be counseled accordingly. Thoracoscopy Patients scheduled for thoracoscopy, particularly limited procedures such as lung biopsy, sympathectomy, and pleural biopsy, often can be discharged the day after surgery. Reports of outpatient thoracoscopy have appeared in the literature, but the presence of a chest tube often dictates an overnight stay [5]. Patients should be advised that the chest tube probably will be removed on the morning after surgery, and that issues such as pain, nausea, and general fatigue will be managed on an outpatient basis. Esophagectomy patients need to be forewarned about early satiety and the possibility of dumping syndrome. The presence of tubes and drains, which are second nature to the surgeon, are not second nature to the patient. The idea of having a chest tube can be frightening to some patients. Drains, wound care, and jejunostomy tubes, all of which are common to thoracic surgery practice, are foreign to medically naive patients. Clinicians must be cognizant of patients' naiveté and address it through good preoperative teaching. Patients need to have some concept of the risks of the planned procedure. Although some patients do not want to face these considerations, the doctrine of informed consent is an integral part of the medical system. The surgeon and members of his or her team need to balance the patient's desire for information (or lack thereof), the need to provide a basis for informed consent, and the undesirable outcome of fostering fear and anxiety. In general, at a minimum, a description of common complications, a qualitative assessment of morbidity and mortality, and an invitation to go into greater detail should be offered. Lung volume reduction surgery (and other operations in patients with severe emphysema) The major specific issue to address in patients with severe emphysema is prolonged air leaks. Discussion of other complications, such as pain control, risks of pneumonia, and the potential for postoperative mechanical ventilation, should not be omitted, but prolonged air leaks with the ongoing need for chest tube drainage specifically should be mentioned. Techniques such as the use of reinforcing strips for surgical staplers and surgical glue can be discussed, although these patients often stay in the hospital for prolonged periods simply because of the need for ongoing pleural drainage. Use of one-way valves and the possibility of being discharged home with a chest tube in place can be discussed in the preoperative phase of care—not as a likely outcome, but so that it is not such a foreign concept if it needs to come up again later. Esophagectomy Esophagectomy is one of the larger operations that thoracic surgeons perform regularly. It is associated with significant short-term and long term morbidity and consequently warrants special attention in a discussion of preoperative teaching. From the patient's perspective, esophagectomy generally is seen in the context of a diagnosis of cancer that carries an unusually poor long-term outlook. The operation generally involves two incisions and is associated with the possibilities of death, a stay in the ICU, chest tubes, feeding tubes, and other daunting obstacles. The “tradeoff” is that patients often start with severe dysphagia (in contrast to lung cancer patients who are generally asymptomatic) and end having a much improved quality of swallowing. For these patients, specific preoperative teaching issues should include the surgical risks (bleeding, infection, anastomotic leak, hoarseness [in the case of a cervical anastomosis], and the risk of perioperative and operative mortality—1–5% in various series). To counterbalance these negatives, relief of dysphagia and the possibility of cure can be raised. The postoperative issues of early satiety, dumping, and regurgitation (the risks of which vary depending on the planned operative approach) all should be discussed, although it should be made clear that the degree of these symptoms and their duration have a wide range. Photodynamic therapy Photodynamic therapy is a technique of ablating obstructing tumors of the major bronchi or esophagus (and now approved for the ablation of columnar-lined esophageal mucosa) that has the undesirable side effect of prolonged cutaneous photosensitivity. The only governmentally approved and commercially available photosensitizing agent in the United States, Photofrin, is associated with a 6-week period of photosensitivity, during which time patients should avoid direct sunlight and wear protective clothes when outside (eg, gloves, wide-brimmed hat, long sleeves, long pants). Failure to be compliant may result in a severe sunburn-like reaction, even to the point of blistering. It is helpful to council patients repeatedly on these restrictions and to use a combination of verbal direction, written material, and a take-home video. Despite all of these modalities, some patients are noncompliant, but because the photosensitivity reaction develops quickly, they rarely repeat their indiscretions. Transplantation On review of the literature on preoperative teaching of patients for thoracic surgery, it is found that the greatest amount of effort has gone into cardiac surgery (not a topic of this article) and transplantation [6], [7], [8]. One reason is that the preoperative assessment of patients for transplantation is far more complicated than it is for most other thoracic surgical patients. The other reason is that, for most transplant patients, the transplant itself is just the start of a transforming process that results in lifelong involvement with the transplant center, the ongoing use of multiple medications, and the need for periodic physiologic and pathologic assessment of the outcome (eg, pulmonary function tests, bronchoscopy with biopsy). The preoperative evaluation of transplant patients attempts to identify patients with the greatest chance of benefiting from receiving a scarce resource (donor organs) and involves a rigorous medical screening and evaluation and a thorough psychosocial evaluation. Drug or alcohol abuse, destructive behavior, noncompliance, and lack of social supports all argue against offering such patients donor organs. This preoperative assessment frequently involves psychologists (or psychiatrists) and social workers in addition to the more “nuclear” team of the surgeon, transplant pulmonologist, and the rest of the transplant team. Given the complexity and lifelong duration of the transplant process, it is not surprising that the preoperative assessment and teaching processes are more involved. Research protocols In addition to providing excellent patient care, academic medical centers have the added responsibilities of teaching and conducting research. For the thoracic surgeon, clinical trials provide a mechanism for improving the outcome of future patients with lung cancer, esophageal cancer, and end-stage lung disease. In many academic medical centers, clinical trial nurses play a vital role in identifying patients for clinical trials and in educating patients about these trials. These discussions involve the nature of the trial, inclusion and exclusion criteria, study design (randomized/prospective versus open-label/historical control), and risks and potential benefits associated with the specific trial in question. Compared with physician investigators, clinical trial nurses often have more time to spend with the patients, may be less perceived as having a vested interest in the outcome of the trial, and may be more open to questions than the physician investigator. The downside is that the nurses may have a less detailed knowledge of the trial (eg, pharmacology, pathophysiology, surgical anatomy). Consequently, physician backup to these clinical trial nurses must be available. Preoperative teaching tools  Verbal instruction Verbal instruction is the cornerstone tool to preoperative teaching, and whoever conveys information verbally must be cognizant of the recipient's intellectual level, interest in acquiring the information, attention span, and emotional ability to handle the information. Multiple factors, such as language barriers, learning disabilities, and cultural barriers, can impair this knowledge transfer, and other strategies, including repetition, provision of written material, interpreters, and drawings, may be necessary. It is often surprising to find that patients, after what was thought to be a thorough preoperative discussion, continue to have basic questions that they are reluctant to discuss with the surgeon and that are asked to the preoperative nurse or other staff only after the surgeon has left. Written material Complementing verbal instruction and direction is the dissemination of written material. Nonprofit organizations have a variety of patient education materials available at relatively low cost. The American Cancer Society has a telephone hotline for information that can be sent to patients free of charge. The information covers general cancer care and preparation for surgery, including topics such as “what questions to ask the doctor” and “what are the risks and side effects of surgery.” The American Lung Association has a large amount of free and low-cost written material on smoking cessation and lung health, including pulmonary function testing, bronchoscopy, lung cancer, and lung transplantation. Lastly, information packets for commonly performed operations can be bought or made “in house”; the latter has the advantage of providing information specific to the institution and surgeons. Manufacturers of commercial products often provide free product-specific patient education packets or booklets. One example is Axcan Pharmaceuticals, which supplies patient education material on photodynamic therapy for lung and esophageal cancer and Barrett's esophagus. Another example is Denver Biomedical, which provides written information and a patient video on its PleurX pleural catheter. Other companies, such as Bristol-Myers-Squibb Oncology and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, supply product-specific and disease-specific patient information and more general cancer care information on topics such as nutrition and exercise in the form of books and pamphlets. Web-based material Much of the information described in this article, in addition to a wealth of additional information, is also available online. The American Cancer Society and the American Lung Association have extensive websites with large amounts of patient-oriented information. In addition, for cancer patients, the National Cancer Institute provides a detailed and user-friendly website (www.cancer.gov) with a wealth of material aimed at the patient level. The University of Pennsylvania (www.oncolink.upenn.edu) also provides an outstanding patient-centered website that is relatively free of institutional and commercial bias. Additional patient-oriented information on clinical trials is available through the Coalition of National Cancer Cooperative Groups (www.cancertrialshelp.org). Numerous pharmaceutical company websites also offer disease-specific information on disease prevention, diagnosis, causes, and treatment. With the ubiquity of Web access, the authors caution patients that information obtained on the Web can be highly biased, poorly referenced, and even self-serving and promotional in nature, but that reputable sources can provide valuable insights into their disease and the treatment options that are available to them. Audiovisual material Another opportunity for teaching includes provision of audiovisual material. Axcan Pharmaceuticals, the supplier of Photofrin, has created a video detailing the risks of photosensitivity and how to avoid such side effects. Diagrams and models also may be used. Commercially available lung models can help the surgeon or clinical nurse specialist explain the concepts of bronchopulmonary segments, lobectomy, and wedge resection. Diagrams, which can be hand-drawn or commercially obtained, can be used to explain anatomic concepts. Lastly, use of the patient's own radiographs can be an excellent teaching method, and patients generally pay a great deal of attention to their own radiographs. It takes relatively little time to explain the basics of a CT scan, and patients are often surprised that what is a “lung nodule” to one physician is a “worrisome mass” to another. Such teaching methods are particularly helpful when patients are to be followed radiographically for an indeterminate pulmonary nodule. As the saying goes, “a picture is worth a thousand words,” and 1 or 2 minutes spent with a real radiograph can take the place of and be more satisfying than a lengthy description of the films. Summary  Preoperative patient teaching may take many forms and is offered to patients across many venues and formats. The goal of patient teaching is to improve patients' understanding of their disease process and the operation that they are about to experience with the goal of enlisting their active participation in the healing process. The additional goal of obtaining informed consent is not only codified in law, but also has become an ingrained component to the current physician-patient relationship. The preoperative teaching process is best approached as a team effort, and multiple modalities often must be used so that the patient becomes a knowledgeable and willing member of the team. References  [1]. [1]Smeltzer SC, Bare BG. Preoperative nursing management. In: Smeltzer SC, Bare BG editor. Brunner and Suddarth's textbook of medical surgical nursing. 10th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004;p. 399–416. [2]. [2]Miro J, Raich RM. Effects of a brief and economical intervention in preparing patients for surgery: does coping style matter?. Pain. 1999;83:471–475. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (66 KB)
|
CrossRef
[3]. [3]Bluman LG, Mosca L, Newman N, Simon DG. Preoperative smoking habits and postoperative pulmonary complications. Chest. 1998;113:883–889. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[4]. [4]Ratner PA, Johnson JL, Richardson CG, et al. Efficacy of a smoking-cessation intervention for elective-surgical patients. Res Nurs Health. 2004;27:148–161. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[5]. [5]Chang AC, Yee J, Orringer MB, Iannettoni MD. Diagnostic thoracoscopic lung biopsy: an outpatient experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:1942–1946. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[6]. [6]Shuldham CM, Fleming S, Goodman H. The impact of pre-operative education on recovery following coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:666–674.
CrossRef
[7]. [7]Hobbs FD. Does pre-operative education of patients improve outcomes? The impact of pre-operative education on recovery following coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:600–601.
CrossRef
[8]. [8]Bahruth AJ. What every patient should know…pretransplantation and posttransplantation. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2004;27:31–60. MEDLINE a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, CVRB 205, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA b Thoracic Surgery Service, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Corresponding author
PII: S1547-4127(05)00010-1 doi:10.1016/j.thorsurg.2005.02.002 © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | |
|